Showing posts with label Speed of Light. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Speed of Light. Show all posts

Sunday, November 30, 2025

Chapter 1: Section 7: Page 62: Line 114 (1096)

 For word was circulating that Michelson and Morley had found no difference in the speed of light coming, going, or sideways relative to the Earth speeding along in its orbit.

* * * * * * * * * *

This is one of those nice "Science Without Math" statements that we can all use from time to most-of-the-time. It simply sums up the experiment without getting in the weeds of the details (although the details are what make this whole Blinky Morgan and Edward Morley are the same person theory interesting). What was the experiment about? It was about measuring the speed of light in several different directions to see if the movement of the Earth changed the speed. A change would indicate that the light was moving through something which was also traveling at those speeds. It should be faster going in the direction of the Earth while slowing down going perpendicular to that direction (or against it, obvs!). Who needs to know how it's done? How the light from one source is split into different beams and bounced in different directions to eventually arrive at the same destination? And how arriving at the same destination in phase (since light was suspected to be simply a wave as sound (which is why is was suspected that it needed a medium to travel through)) would indicate that direction didn't hamper its speed. Only if each beam arrived out of phase would there be an indication that the movement and inertia of the Earth would be affecting it. And that out-of-phase bit was what made Merle's theory into a lengthy philosophical sidebar that Pynchon has spent an awful lot of time on. Which he doesn't do with all of his strange little tales so it must have been especially important to the overall themes of the novel. I suspect it backs up the idea that Lew has been split from another Earth to find himself on one where he has become a pariah among those he once knew and loved. But then I could be biased because that was my initial impression of my first reading of the Lew Basnight sections.

Maybe as Mark Z. Danielewski says in his new novel, Tom's Crossing, in the section where the mortician does the autopsy on Russell's body, I need to uninstall my initial bias of Lew's possible dimension hopping. Or, if I want to remain loyal to Thomas Pynchon here, I need to get beyond the zero to rid myself of not just the bias but the idea of the bias too. I think. Remember how not smart I am? I still have trouble with the idea of "Beyond the Zero"!

Wednesday, April 5, 2023

Chapter 1: Section 7: Page 58: Line 21 (1003)

 And anything that happened at the speed of light would have too many unknowables attached to begin with—closer to religion than science.

**********

"closer to religion than science"
This sounds like some of that "common sense" pablum. You know, when some dolt says, "He may be smart but he doesn't have any common sense," to make them feel superior to the smart person. But common sense is stupid. It's observation without scientific backing! It's making assumptions about the world based on basic perceptions! Common sense says that the sun revolves around the Earth. Because you can see the sun moving across the sky. That's common sense. Science is all, "Yes, that is what it looks like! Good perception! But I'm about to blow your mind, baby!" "Common sense" is closer to religion than science ever could be!
    People also love to point out that people who believe in science have faith just like a religious person. They have faith in their theories and whatnot. But obviously that's about as insipid an opinion as somebody could vocalize! Scientific theorems are based on evidence while the main attribute of faith is that it cannot have any evidence to support it. If there's evidence to support a conclusion, there is no room for faith. So shut up with your faith-based arguments against science, stupid people!

Although, really, I get what Merle is getting at. Science always seems to have an event horizon which we can't imagine ever truly being able to understand. In the 1880s, the speed of light must have been bewildering! But they had already developed experiments to begin working with light and methods with which to measure it and observe how it might change based on other variables (the whole point of the Michelson-Morley experiment). I think about this limit in terms of The Big Bang. I can't imagine how it could ever be knowable what was happening on the other side. I don't see theorizing about it as being close to religion though. But then I've been areligious my entire life and so I'm not too fazed by unknowables. Let them be unknowable! I've got turnips to buy!