Sunday, April 2, 2023

Chapter 1: Section 7: Page 58: Line 18 (999)

 One day Merle had read in the Hartford Courant about a couple of professors at the Case Institute in Cleveland who were planning an experiment to see what effect, if any, the motion of the Earth had on the speed of light through the luminiferous Æther.

**********

"Hartford Courant"
This Connecticut newspaper is apparently the oldest continuously published newspaper in the United States, beginning its life as the Connecticut Courant in 1764. Merle would have been a reader of this paper as we learned, from his association with Heino Vanderjuice, he was a Connecticut resident. Merle, interested in light and photography, had a mechanical aptitude which he used to help build machines for Professor Vanderjuice back at Yale.

"a couple of professors at the Case Institute in Cleveland"
Physicists Albert Michelson and Edward Morley. The Case Institute wasn't actually known as the Case Institute of Technology until 1947. At the time, it would have been the Case School of Applied Science. But don't be too hard on Pynchon about that. It's not like I would have known any better if I didn't have the Internet to help me understand every single reference Pynchon makes.

"were planning an experiment"
The experiment described in this passage took place between April and July of 1887.

"to see what effect, if any, the motion of the Earth had on the speed of light through the luminiferous Æther"
This experiment is just one of the major changes happening around the liminal space of 1890. Being that Against the Day is one of Pynchon's four great novels he had within him (the others being Mason & Dixon, Gravity's Rainbow, and, well, um, I don't know. Has he done the fourth?! Are the three I named even three of the four?! You'd think I'd do some outside research on shit like this), it takes place at a pivotal place in history (especially the history of Western Civilization, or at least through its perspective, and particularly the American perspective), science, economics, and any other academic subject you can think of.
    While meant to determine motions effect on the speed of light, what the experiment actually presented was strong evidence that Æther didn't exist. So we have the world before 1887 where science simply took for granted that a substance or medium must exist within vacuums and all around us that enables light waves to pass through (as waves through water or sound through air/water), dubbing the mystery substance Æther, and the time after where an entirely new understanding of what light might be and how it works was needed. So just as the Frontier was disappearing, changing the entire landscape of America and our relationship with it and each other, Æther was disappearing as well, turning the physics of light on its head.
    Reading about the failed experiment reminds one of reading Gravity's Rainbow due to all the talk of sine waves and zeroes. I don't think they ever mention beyond the zero though! But beyond this experiment, which was pretty much the nail in the coffin for ether (both physicists themselves ceasing their experimentation into the nature of Æther and concentrating instead on light's properties) and opened up the scientific world for accepting the idea of special relativity. Whatever that is, amirite?! I think that just means light doesn't go faster if a train turns on its headlights because it just phase shifts to red or something (unless it's blue!).

More of my thoughts on this moment in time here!

Chapter 1: Section 7: Page 58: Line 17 (998)

 Which usually was how Dally got to hear about her mother, in these bits and pieces.

**********

I suppose this is fitting, being that her name is Dally. She learns about her mother slowly through Merle's aimless wandering thoughts, mostly focused on his sexual dalliances with her. I'm guessing that's the case because of the whole "she was going to find out in a minute and half anyway" bit of his story. So, yes, I'm making assumptions based on my immaturity.

"bits and pieces"
Glue! I need glue!

Chapter 1: Section 7: Page 58: Line 16 (997)

 "What was I doing in Cleveland in the first place?"

**********

I'm used to Pynchon collapsing scenes by shifting through time and space abruptly without letting the reader know. But I don't remember his characters basically doing the same thing within one dialogue. Maybe this is how conversations with astute and intelligent five year old kids often go. Feels more like Ann Nocenti dialogue in a DC Comic book than Thomas Pynchon! I'm used to her characters not actually listening to each other while talking past them, basically engaging in two monologues instead of one dialogue.

I suppose the point is that Dally, from the time she could talk, was constantly asking questions about her mother and Merle told her whatever he could manage to tell her at the time. And this mini-conversation allows Pynchon to steer the story to that place in time in Cleveland where Merle met Erlys. I'm glad I don't have to blame the conversation being terrible on Pynchon's writing because one of the two people talking is just a little kid and how much sense do they typically make? And Merle is still rattled from his broken heart so we should excuse his inability to answer a direct question from a toddler.

Anyway, we're going to learn why Merle was in Cleveland soon! Is that something we were dying to know? If not, we are now, right?!

Chapter 1: Section 7: Page 58: Line 15 (996)

 "And . . ."

**********

I don't know what information Dally is trying to prompt from Merle after his last bit of dialogue with this "please continue" moment. Fortunately I don't feel all that stupid because Merle's response shows Merle has no idea either.

Chapter 1: Section 7: Page 58: Lines 13-14 (994-995)

 "Figured there was no point trying to hide it. Minute and a half longer, she'd've figured it out anyway."

**********

"Minute and a half longer, she'd've figured it out anyway"
Were they having sex when they first saw each other?

This entire conversation makes no sense. Perhaps this did happen when Dally was five because she has no idea that Merle has no idea how to answer questions.

"What attracted you to her?"
"Oh, well, she didn't run away when I told her I was attracted to her."
"So it was love at first she didn't reject you when you said you were attracted to her for not rejecting you?"
"Well, she was going to figure it out soon enough since I was going to tell her that I was attracted to her to find out if I was attracted to her by her reaction to me telling her I was attracted to her."

Don't worry! There are just two lines left in the conversation and it doesn't get any better!