"You're quite right, of course, the Æther has always been a religious question.
**********
"a religious question"
I suppose all scientific theory must be born from faith or we would ultimately learn nothing. If we only believe what we see evidence of without somebody extrapolating further on their observations, then nobody would ever come up with theories to test. At what point does a scientific theory go from the religious to the scientific? It seems to me what's most religious in the arena of science is when the evidence has stacked up against a long-held theory and yet adherents continue to cling to it.
Here Heino agrees with Merle that Æther has been a religious question because it has merely been theorized as something needed to uphold scientists' views on light and its properties. Kind of like how String Theory's multiple dimensions haven't been proved in any actual way but are only theorized because of the math. Or maybe dark matter is a closer comparison, pretty much being the modern day equivalent of Æther in that it seems to be needed for the current model of the universe and general relativity to work.